The Interactive Installations of
Yayoi Kusama and Olafur Eliasson
By: Jenny Mortimore
For
artists Yayoi Kusama and Olafur Eliasson,
natural space and light mean everything. For this assignment I chose two artists that work in a wide
variety of media but both find their strengths in digital, environmental
installations that challenge their audiences' sense of reality. The two are not
completely different but do not define reality the same. In their
representative works, Fireflies on the Water and Feelings are
Facts, both artists tackle the concept of reality in their own unique ways
with great use of space and lighting. Despite using digital technology in their
work to illustrate their concept of reality, both artists confront the question
of “the world we are missing
and the world we need.”
Japanese artist Yayoi Kusama is an activist, feminist,
and her paintings and style have been a major influence for artists such as
Andy Warhol. She first came to the United States in 1957 to showcase her
collection of paintings and to share in her ideas for environmental sculptures
using artistic illusions like mirrors and lights. In the latter 1960s, she had become
more of an activist in her career and organized many events such as body painting
displays in the streets of New York, fashion shows and anti-war demonstrations.
Years later in her career, she would become more attached to the digital medium
and launched media-related activities such as film productions. Her digital work became more recognized after 1968, with the film, “Kusama's
Self-Obliteration" which Kusama produced and starred in. This particular
film was awarded at the International Experimental Film Competition in Belgium
and featured many techniques that were unique at the time for film artists.
Yayoi Kusama always retained the central theme of
seemingly endless space in all of her work. This central focus of her artistic
career has always been to convey this seemingly endless space to her viewers to
better convey her idea of reality. Her piece, Fireflies on the Water, from 2002 was an exceptional example of an
installation that creates a space in which individual viewers are invited to
transcend their own sense of reality. Fireflies
on the Water is a carefully constructed environment in which only one
person is allowed in the room at a time to create a more intimate setting. Hundreds
if lights are suspended from the ceiling with mirrors on every wall and water
surrounding the platform the individual walks out into the center of the room
on. This particular installation suspends the viewer into a reality of their
own while the infinity of lights surrounds them. The mirrors are meant to have
the observers see themselves in the infinity of the universe to reflect the
reality as infinite and to have the viewer determine what part they play in
that reality.
In
his installation Feelings are Facts Eliasson, with the help of Ma Yansong, uses a color
atlas to have viewers navigate their way through dense fog, seemingly endless
color palettes, and a brilliantly illuminated atmosphere. He uses this installation
to present exploration into the nature of reality. In a press release for their
artwork they even posed the questions, "what should be the basis of our
thinking and judgment in a space where reality and illusion interconnect? As we
stand amidst such accomplished phenomena, can we re-examine with greater
concern our sensations and experiences of that which is around us?" (UCCA). As the
audience navigates through the environment of refracted light and the illusions
of color, they also seem to navigate through their own sense of reality by
defining what it is they are experiencing.
There
is a lot in common and a lot of unique differences between Fireflies
on the Water and Feelings are Facts. Kusama’s work
seems to be the ultimate self-obsession where the individuals are meant to see
themselves at the centre of, and infinitely reflected in, the
universe. Kusama’s artworks seem to ask how the spectators view
themselves; not only within the artwork, but also in relation to their
environment: do they feel what it is like to be ‘a dot in the universe.’ Kusama
also uses a more objects in her work to better illustrate her ideas of infinite
reality in order to make her viewers feel small, but focus on what
makes them unique.
However,
both Kusama and Eliasson create spaces in which individuals challenge
their basis of thinking and judgment and become a part
of the art itself. It is as if both artists, with their activist
backgrounds, are having their viewers interact with the work and become apart
of the strong messages they both possess. In her essay, Tactical
Media as Virtuosic Performance, Raley describes tactical media as “forms of critical
intervention, dissent, and resistance” that can “manifest in virtuoso
performance rather than extrinsic product.” Raley also explains it as “new
media work that is at once aesthetic design, intellectual investigation,
and political activism” (Raley; p.1-2). The works engage the audience in a
natural environment with lights as illusion and excellent use of space. Similar to David O'Reilly's
theory in Basic Animation Aesthetics, both Kusama and Eliasson believe,
"The more elemental and simple an environment, the more exciting and
visually rewarding it is when we introduce changes to it" (O'Reilly; p.3).
To work with another one of our readings, I believe that bother artists, although working with a digital medium, possess the “aura” that Walter Benjamin discusses in The Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction. Benjamin says, "We define the aura of [natural objects] as the unique phenomenon of a distance, however close it may be. If, while resting on a summer afternoon, you follow with your eyes a mountain range on the horizon or a branch which casts its shadow over you, you experience the aura of those mountains, of that branch” (Benjamin; III). This aura is present in both of the artists’ work because the audience has the ability to interact with the message in that piece. It is an aura acquired through interaction and, although their perception is not anchored to the past, the audience is never distanced by the artwork.
Finally,
in Claire Bishop’s article Digital Divide she says, "While many artists use digital
technology, how many really confront the question of what it means to think,
see, and filter affect through the digital? How many thematize this,
or reflect deeply on how we experience, and are altered by, the digitization of
our existence?" (Bishop; p.2). After becoming familiar with both artists and their environmental installations, I can affirm that artist working in this variety
know exactly what feelings they are projecting through their work and "reflect deeply" on how the audience experiences it. There very
much exists a need to have the populace and culture react and become involved
with the same feelings as the artists. For activists like Yayoi Kusama and
Olafur Eliasson, there is a passionate display of how reality works with nature
through the use of digital tools. Both are successful in their own creative
ways.
Work Cited
1. "Olafur
Eliasson." Olafur Eliasson. http://www.olafureliasson.net/index.html, Web. 07 Nov. 2013.
2. "Information |
Yayoi Kusama." Information | Yayoi Kusama. http://www.yayoi-kusama.jp., n.d. Web. 07
Nov. 2013.
3. "Yayoi Kusama." Wikipedia.
Wikimedia Foundation, 28 Oct. 2013. Web. 07 Nov. 2013.
4. "Olafur Eliasson:
Playing with Space and Light." TED: Ideas worth Spreading. N.p.,
n.d.
Web.
11 Dec. 2013.
5. "OLAFUR ELIASSON
& MA YANSONG--FEELINGS ARE FACTS | Ullens Center for Contemporary
Art." Ullens Center for Contemporary Art. N.p., n.d. Web. 11 Dec.
2013.
6. O'Reilly. Basic Animation Aesthetics.
N.p.: n.p., n.d. Print.
7. Benjamin, Walter, and J. A. Underwood. The
Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction.
London: Penguin, 2008. Print.
8. Raley, Rita. Tactical Media.
Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, 2009. Print.
No comments:
Post a Comment